We Don't Suck THAT Much
From The Griddle and somebody named "Sam"...
I suppose that this'll be used as another one of those strawmen arguments that people have been trotting out to make us feel good about the 95-loss dog we're watching because it's not historically bad, even though any objective look at the team pre-season showed that there was little chance for them to be historically bad.
I suppose that this'll be used as another one of those strawmen arguments that people have been trotting out to make us feel good about the 95-loss dog we're watching because it's not historically bad, even though any objective look at the team pre-season showed that there was little chance for them to be historically bad.
posted by Chris Needham at
2:02 PM
5 Comments:
That is HYSTERICAL! LMAO!
By
DCSportsChick, at 6/12/2007 2:59 PM
Bet young Jake could take Curly Neal off the dribble.
By
Anonymous, at 6/12/2007 3:04 PM
Dammit, Chris, Everyone, EVERYONE, had the Nats losing at least 130 games. This team is a freakin' miracle. What are they on, a 68 win pace? We're talking Wildest Dreams here. I think I saw the virgin mary mowed into the OF on the last homestand.
By
Harper, at 6/13/2007 9:21 AM
It could be worse-we could be the Royals. Not only do they suck, but apparently the powers that be in KC have decided to replace "Take Me Out to the Ballgame" in the 7th with a "new song" to be voted on by the fans. Seriously.
By
Anonymous, at 6/13/2007 10:34 AM
I'll admit that during that first abysmal week and a half of the season, I was rapidly becoming convinced that this was an all-time brutal, historically bad team.
The way that the team has performed overall since then has left me nothing short of amazed, especially considering some of the starting pitching we've had to throw out there. I'm still not 100% convinced that this level of play can possibly continue through the whole season.
By
Anonymous, at 6/13/2007 1:03 PM
Post a Comment
<< Home