Just like the Orioles Beat Writer does when he starts one of his WaPo chats, lets lay out some ground rules. (or at least facts)
1) Brendan Donnelly was cheating. Mike Scioscia can spin it any way he wants, calling it an 'accepted practice', but having a gob of pine tar in your glove is a pretty clear violation of major league rules.
2) Jose Guillen does still have some anger issues.
3) Frank did nothing wrong by having the umpires check out Donnelly. They had reason to suspect he was up to something, and were proved right. Even if they were proved wrong, it was acceptable for Frank to try it.
4) Frank certainly seems batshit crazy sometimes.
In the 7th inning of last night's game, Brendan Donnelly was brought in to relieve the starting pitcher. Before Donnelly, who has struggled of late, could fire a pitch, Frank was out of the dugout asking the umps to inspect BD's glove, where they found 'quite a bit' of pine tar. He was ejected.
Then Mike Scioscia (not an easy name to spell), got in Frank's face and started yelling at him. Frank, who isn't going to be disrespected like that by no youngin', got right back in Robinson's face and unsheathed a deadly weapon, his pointing finger.
A few animated points, and a few shouts later, the benches started to empty, and the bullpens stormed the field. It was the typical group hug disguised as a baseball brawl, except for one thing. Jose Guillen had to be dragged off the field. It was like a scene out of a bad horror movie where a patient needs to be held down by five or six people. They managed to get him in the dugout, but still his veins bulged, and still he shouted. Thankfully, he channelled his anger on that Scott Shields slider.
A lot of the Angels blogs are ripping Frank and Guillen. The Guillen anger is still an offshoot of last year's problems, but the Frank anger is completely undeserved.
Was Frank just supposed to sit by while BD had a foreign substance on his glove? If we can't agree that Frank was right to protest, then we're incapable of having a rational discussion about anything.
Some of the anger is aimed at how Frank 'escalated' the argument by unsheathing his pointy finger.
But, if you watch the replay, it's Mike Scioscia who walks over to Frank and starts yelling at him in the first place.
Once Scioscia starts defending the indefensible (and probably throwing in a few choice words) Frank gave it right back to him. Certainly Scioscia was frustrated, but he needs to channel his anger at his player for doing something dumb, not at the opposing manager for pointing out something that's illegal by baseball's rules.
Some of their anger is aimed at how Frank wouldn't allow the media full access to Jose Guillen. (See
my post yesterday for the details)
In acting as a shield between the media, some of whom are there just to pick fights, Frank was able to deflect some of the attention to himself, instead of letting the full brunt come down on Guillen. He was protecting his players, which is one of the primary jobs of a manager.
And for the idiots who are asking 'who the hell is Frank to not let the media do their job', they need to learn a little more about how the baseball media works. There are frequently ground rules to these sorts of press conferences. The journalists loathe it, but it's the way things work. Questions about last year's incident were off limits. Yeah, it'd be nice if they had full and open access and honest answers all the time, but that's not the way it works. And you can't blame Frank for that.
_____
what we've seen over the last few weeks is a consolidation of power in Frank as the leader of the team. Problem children, like Ohka, Day and Endy, have been cast to the hinterlands. It's pretty clear that Bowden has Frank's back; if you create problems, you'll be gone.
That's not to say that I think they have an authoritarian clubhouse. It's just that they want a professional atmosphere with the goals of the team first. Ohka wanted to start more, and to be allowed to work deeper into games. Rightly or wrongly (I'm leaning towards wrongly), Frank didn't feel that that was the best interest of the team. When Ohka raised a stink, he was traded to the land of Wurst.
As Jose Guillen said, there aren't many people in that clubhouse that like Frank. But, there probably isn't a man in that clubhouse who doesn't respect Frank. And there's not a man in that clubhouse who doesn't believe that Frank's busting his 70-year-old ass to win for them.
Things like that can really bring a team together. This isn't a team that needs a ton of management. It's a surprisingly veteran team. But, Frank is helping to focus the team on BEING a team.
You can disparage things like chemistry. And I certainly don't like how far too many people take the easy route and using chemistry as a catch-all for things they can't ordinarily account for. But, it is an important factor.
Have you ever worked at a place where you didn't like your boss, or like the people you worked with? Did you feel motivated to do your best? Did your concentration wane at all?
People crave leadership. We all want to work for a boss who has clear directions and some sort of vision, even if we may not personally like the guy.
And that's what Frank is asserting. He's letting his guys know that he'll stand up for them, and that if they play hard, they can succeed.
This is a team with many things going against it, playing in the toughest division in baseball. There is no margin for error. Frank realizes this and is trying to extract every advantage he can.
Now about those bunts, Frank....
