Thursday, May 03, 2007

Questions For Rosenthal?

Ken Rosenthal is chatting about yesterday's article on the Nats at 1 today.

Got any questions for him? Got any complaints? You may want to put the spit guard on your monitor before you read some of the questions he's asked.

  • I'd urge you to read Federal Baseball's take on the Rosenthal article. It's a fair (and dare I say) balanced take on the article, and makes the argument that 90% of what's in it, can probably be casually disregarded.

    Particularly interesting to me is this aspect:
    An alternative theory -- though concededly not necessarily one of my own -- is that Kasten wields less power than it seems; instead, it is the Lerners who are penny-pinching either out of inexperience in organized baseball or because they are born penny-pinchers. Certainly, the thought is not without support. Rosenthal's article is not the first to reference a Lerner family member's personal knowledge of even de minimis expenditures by the team. Moreover, while the Lerner/Kasten marriage has the public veneer of a lockstep bond, the reality might be something different. Remember, Kasten was a late addition to the Lerner bid; up until then, Kasten had been most rumored as Fred Malek's white knight. Now, I'm not saying I know something about this (because I don't), but dozens of "insider" accounts insist Bowden still has a job in Washington because he ingratiated himself with Mark Lerner. Kasten appears to have compromised in some manner on the issue because even he acknowledges he has come around to like Bowden; as has been reported, Kasten's first impression of Bowden wasn't necessarily positive, since he has friends in the game who like Bodes and friends in the game who don't. Anyway, the point I'm trying to make (or at least proffer) is the possibility that Kasten and the Lerners have not yet settled into a comfortable working arrangement. While Kasten is clearly the club president and has much authority in player personnel matters, it seems conceivable there is some overlap on business matters.

    Definitely an interesting thought!

  • 4 Comments:

    • There is nothing new in the Rosenthal article. We knew that the Lerner's are cheap and that Bowden is a first class jerk.

      By Anonymous Anonymous, at 5/03/2007 1:15 PM  

    • Ken raised 2 important points to keep our eyes on:

      1. Morale? Will Kasten and Bowden treat players and other personnel with respect and dignity? Or will they treat them as "assets" who can always be replaced?

      2. Cheeep? Will the Lerners, eh, learn to loosen the pursestrings when its wise?

      By Anonymous Anonymous, at 5/03/2007 1:49 PM  

    • What struck me about this article, and about Rosenthal's chat on the Post's website yesterday, is that he keeps claiming that "I felt that some of the things that were taking place were beyond the norm, even for an ownership inheriting a difficult situation." Yet I saw no real evidence for such a claim in the article.

      Simply saying that "many current and former employees feel the same way" isn't enough. If you're going to make the claim that the Nats are permanently dysfunctional (and that's what Rosenthal is trying to sell here), then you've got to go deeper. My (admittedly optimistic) viewpoint is that these issues are temporary problems related to transition, holdovers from MLB's irresponsible ownership regime, or isolated incidents. Rosenthal does absolutely nothing to dispel that belief.

      Of course, it's Fox, so the emphasis on bluster over content should not suprise me.

      By Blogger Ben, at 5/04/2007 8:49 AM  

    • I don't think he said that any of this was permanent dysfucntion at all. In fact, he said that he figures some of these can be fixed easily.

      He was just surprised that some of these were happening on a MLB level, and with an experienced MLB executive at the helm.

      The second part of your second graf is a fair reading of the series.

      By Blogger Chris Needham, at 5/04/2007 8:52 AM  

    Post a Comment

    << Home