Tuesday, December 20, 2005

Mayor Barry, The Cock Who Crowed

The Washington Post has an excellent story on the backroom stadium dealings over the past week. It's full of lots of good info and juicy stories -- all of which have been missing from the picture we've seen.

It's all under the headline "Barry Moved To Block Stadium" and starts with some heated political blather from the former Mayor. I thought this was going to be a story about the cock who took credit for making the sun rise each day, but it gets better:
Thursday, he summoned Brown, David A. Catania (I-At Large), Phil Mendelson (D-At Large) and Vincent C. Gray (D-Ward 7) to a meeting in his fourth-floor office at the John A. Wilson Building. Williams and his advisers joined them, Barry said, and Williams's aides confirmed.

Barry said yesterday that he had intended for D.C. entrepreneur Jonathan Ledecky, who is one of eight bidders trying to buy the Washington Nationals, to present a plan Ledecky had agreed to with Barry. If baseball sold Ledecky the Nationals, Barry said, Ledecky had agreed to cover cost overruns on the stadium and give African Americans a 40 percent equity stake in the team.

But Barry said he was told by Ledecky's adviser, Frank Smith Jr., a former D.C. Council member, that baseball officials had gotten wind of the plan and told Ledecky to make no such offer. According to several council members in the room, Stephen M. Green, the mayor's top adviser on baseball issues, acknowledged he had tipped off baseball officials.

Furious, Barry accused Green of sabotaging the deal, and the meeting broke up without further discussion, several people at the meeting said.

"I went off," Barry said. "This was too delicate a thing to call MLB."

Essentially, Barry was prepared to tell baseball Ledecky or the highway. Reading the tea leaves, and assuming that Barry knows how MLB operates (a big assumption, I know!) he essentially gave MLB the choice of the highway or the highway. There's no way the city would let Barry dictate their choice at this point; Barry had to have known that, which is why his strategy is disingenuous, at best.

The story notes that Brown, Gray, and Mendelson never actually agreed to the arrangement, but that the idea of someone else picking up the cost overruns is what's so attractive about the idea.

It's pretty clear that MLB has overplayed its hand. There was talk that just a simple IOU letter from the Feds to cover the cost of Metro improvements would be enough to sneak the lease through, but the anti-stadium crowd is getting more vocal.

The Council is set to meet right after the New Year, and it's highly unlikely that things will be ready to go by then. The bonds were technically supposed to be in place by the end of the year, but as we've discussed before, there aren't any penalties until two years after the deadline -- and even then, the penalties amount to zippo.

____

One more thought...

The team isn't going to leave (at least based on these developments). While we think of MLB itself owning the team, it's important to remember that it has 29 other shareholders. The Royals and Blue Jays, for example, have opened their wallets this season in an attempt to create some excitement around their franchises. It's awfully convenient that it's happening in a year where they're set to make $15 million or so thanks to the sale of the team, huh? Selig works by consensus, and $15 million is a lot for David Glass to concede.

8 Comments:

  • in a secret deal yet to be revealed, marion barry has agreed to deliver the necessary 7 votes if the team nickname is changed to "the washington crackpipes."

    By Anonymous Anonymous, at 12/21/2005 6:43 AM  

  • What, if any, impact will this revelation have on the Lerner/Ledecky bid from MLB's perspective? Could this cost Lerner a shot at ownership, paring the list to Malek or Smulyan? Will it force Lerner to drop Ledecky as a partner?

    By Blogger Brian, at 12/21/2005 8:09 AM  

  • If it was something that Ledecky involved himself with, I can't imagine that MLB would be too thrilled with that. They don't want to be strongarmed, and the entire reason they haven't named an owner to this point is because they didn't want these guys getting involved in the gutter politics.

    I know that everything in this city revolves around race, but kind of racial you pat my back, I'll pat yours really bothers me.

    By Blogger Chris Needham, at 12/21/2005 8:35 AM  

  • And yes, Ledecky is with Soros.

    When the Post did their profiles of the owners, Ledecky got lumped in with Yusef Jackson at the potential owners' kiddy table.

    By Blogger Chris Needham, at 12/21/2005 8:39 AM  

  • I don't know who's the bigger fool, Anthony Williams or Marion Barry and all the council members who might have thought that they could get one over on "the man".

    It looks pretty clear that they're going to get sued now, and they're going to discover pretty quickly that baseball covered their behinds from every possible angle. The council had better pray they get a very sympathetic judge; they're going to need it. The fools never should have signed an agreement to do something they didn't want to do in the first place.

    By Anonymous Anonymous, at 12/21/2005 10:36 AM  

  • This is an obvious power play stunt by Barry. Think about it--if baseball chooses Ledecky, he gets credit for finalizing the deal (once again stealing the spotlight from the mayor), and making sure that black folks had a portion of the team. (The latter of which is just...God...it's so ridiculously lame.)

    If baseball takes a hike, Barry gets credit for "standing up to the greedy owners" and all that other pandering bull.

    Either way, this is about the sun rising and falling on Marion Barry's ass. Just because they call you "Mayor for Life", Barry, doesn't give you license to take the nickname literally. Shut up.

    By Blogger vcthree, at 12/21/2005 2:57 PM  

  • Well said!

    By Blogger Chris Needham, at 12/21/2005 3:01 PM  

  • Let me clarify my statement about Barry padding the deal with the 40% minority ownership quid pro quo being lame, before I get flamed on that point.

    It's not lame, at least on the preface, that Ledecky or any other owner would consider adding minority (as in latino or black) partners as part of the ownership group. What's lame about it is that he negotiated this with Barry, so Barry could use that as a stipend to push through yet another amendment to a deal that has been negotiated, signed and agreed to, then reworked a trillion times to this point, and then try to force that on MLB, as if he were negotiator-in-chief.

    That's what's lame about it. It's being done to appease Marion Barry, because Barry believes he's a kingmaker when it comes to citywide affairs. So, requiring Ledecky to have minorities hold a 40% stake in team ownership cheapens the significance of having the minority ownership in place. Moreover, doing so would allow Barry to crow about the city talking about how he was the one to make sure that "the citizens of D.C. were represented in the ownership of the team". It wouldn't mean jack at that point, because it was quid pro quo.

    By Blogger vcthree, at 12/21/2005 4:58 PM  

Post a Comment

<< Home